Docket Entries Since Last Update
NOTE: This court's RSS feed does not list MOTION entries, so Bloomberg Law cannot detect them and thus they will not be listed here. However, motions will be included if you update the docket.
Court Dockets
Supreme Court of United States
Docket for Case #: 20A62
Docket for Case #: 20A62
Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce, et al., Applicants vs. National Urban League, et al.
DOCKET INFORMATION
Minimize
| ||
|
| ||
|
Expand All
| Respondents |
National Urban League, et al.
Respondents
|
| |
| Representation | |||
| Melissa Arbus Sherry Counsel of Record 555 Eleventh Street, NW Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004 melissa.sherry@lw.com | |||
| Entry | Filed | Description | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL-1 | Oct 7, 2020 | View | Application (20A62) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan. | |||
| ||||||
| BL-2 | Oct 7, 2020 | View | Application (20A62) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan. | |||
| ||||||
| BL-3 | Oct 7, 2020 | View | Application (20A62) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan. | |||
| ||||||
| BL-4 | Oct 8, 2020 | Request | Response to application (20A62) requested by Justice Kagan, due Saturday, October 10, 2020, by 10 a.m. ET. | |||
| BL-5 | Oct 10, 2020 | View | Response to application from respondents National Urban League, et al. filed. | |||
| ||||||
| BL-6 | Oct 10, 2020 | View | Response to application from respondents National Urban League, et al. filed. | |||
| ||||||
| BL-7 | Oct 10, 2020 | View | Reply of applicants Wilbur Ross, et al. filed. | |||
| ||||||
| BL-8 | Oct 10, 2020 | View | Reply of applicants Wilbur Ross, et al. filed. | |||
| ||||||
| BL-9 | Oct 13, 2020 | Request | Application (20A62) referred to the Court. | |||
| BL-10 | Oct 13, 2020 | View | Application (20A62) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted. The district court s September 24, 2020 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from grant of stay.(Detached Opinion). | |||
| ||||||