Request a Demo Log In
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps, Docket No. 17-05043 (D.C. Cir. Mar 15, 2017), Court Docket
X1Q6NQJKJGO2
DOCKETS
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps

Search

Search over:

No Matches Found

Search term(s) not found.

Docket Entries Since Last Update
NOTE: This court's RSS feed does not list MOTION entries, so Bloomberg Law cannot detect them and thus they will not be listed here. However, motions will be included if you update the docket.

Copy with Citation

Copy the text below to paste into your document.

Link citations to Bloomberg Law
Court Dockets
cadc
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Docket for Case #: 17-5043

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps

DOCKET INFORMATION
Minimize
Date Filed: Mar 15, 2017
Status: Closed
Nature of suit:2893 Environmental Matters
Original Cases:
1:16-cv-01534-JEB on 2016-07-27, United States District Court for the District of Columbia
District: 0090
Lead Case: 1:16-cv-01534-JEB
NOA Date: Mar 10, 2017

Parties and Attorneys

Expand AllMinimize
Expand All
Hide Section

 Plaintiff - Appellee
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe
Plaintiff - Appellee
Representation
Patti Ann Goldman, Attorney
Earthjustice
810 Third Avenue
Suite 610
Seattle, WA 98104-1711
Personal: 206-343-7340
[NTC Trial Counsel]

 Intervenor for Plaintiff - Appellant
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Intervenor for Plaintiff - Appellant
Representation
Nicole E. Ducheneaux, Attorney
Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
3610 North 163rd Plaza
Omaha, NE 68116
Business: 402-333-4053
[COR NTC Retained]
Conly J. Schulte
Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
1900 Plaza Drive
Louisville, CO 80027
Personal: 303-673-9600
[COR NTC Retained]

 Defendant - Appellee
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Defendant - Appellee
Representation
James Maysonett, Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
PO Box 7415, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044-7415
Business: 202-514-2000
[COR LD NTC Gvt US DOJ]
DOJ Appellate Counsel
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Business: 202-514-2000
Personal: 202-305-3701
[NTC Gvt US DOJ]

 Intervenor for Defendant - Appellee
Dakota Access LLC
Intervenor for Defendant - Appellee
Representation
David John Debold
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036-5306
Business: 202-955-8500
[COR NTC Retained]
Miguel A. Estrada
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036-5306
Business: 202-955-8500
Personal: 202-955-8257
[COR NTC Retained]
William Scott Scherman, Attorney
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036-5306
Business: 202-955-8500
Personal: 202-887-3510
[COR NTC Retained]

 Movant-Intervenor for Appellant
Clayton S. Creek
Movant-Intervenor for Appellant
Representation
Clayton S. Creek
Mike Durfee State Prison
1412 Wood Street
Springfield, SD 57062-2238
[NTC Pro Se]
Warden (Springfield MDSP)
Mike Durfee State Prison
1412 Wood Street
Springfield, SD 57062-2238
[NTC -]

Docket Entries

Reverse Entries
Hide Section
Print Entries Request Entries Reverse Entries

EntryFiledPDFDescription
BL-1Mar 15, 2017RequestUS CIVIL CASE docketed. [17-5043]
BL-2Mar 15, 2017ViewNOTICE OF APPEAL [1666169] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:16-cv-01534-JEB filed by Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 17-5043. [17-5043]
BL-3Mar 15, 2017RequestENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1666188] filed by Miguel A. Estrada and co-counsel William S. Scherman, David Debold on behalf of Appellee Dakota Access LLC. [17-5043] (Estrada, Miguel)
BL-4Mar 15, 2017RequestENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1666260] filed by Nicole E. Ducheneaux on behalf of Appellant Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. [17-5043] (Ducheneaux, Nicole)
BL-5Mar 15, 2017View<i>EMERGENCY</i> MOTION [1666261] for injunction (Response to Motion served by mail due on 03/27/2017) filed by Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe (Service Date: 03/15/2017 by CM/ECF NDA, Email) Length Certification: 5155 Words. [17-5043] (Ducheneaux, Nicole)
BL-6Mar 15, 2017RequestCERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1666262] filed by Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe [Service Date: 03/15/2017 ] [17-5043] (Ducheneaux, Nicole)
BL-7Mar 15, 2017RequestENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1666263] filed by Conly J. Schulte on behalf of Appellant Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. [17-5043] (Schulte, Conly)
BL-8Mar 16, 2017RequestENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1666323] filed by James A. Maysonett on behalf of Appellee United States Army Corps of Engineers. [17-5043] (Maysonett, James)
BL-9Mar 16, 2017RequestPER CURIAM ORDER [1666385] It is ORDERED, on the courts own motion, that appellees file responses to the motion by 2:00 p.m. on Friday, March 17, 2017; and that appellant file any reply by 6:00 p.m. on Friday, March 17, 2017. The responses and reply may not exceed the length limitations established by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(d)(2). The parties are directed to hand-deliver the paper copies of their submissions to the court by the time and date due. Before Judges: Kavanaugh, Millett and Wilkins. [17-5043]
BL-10Mar 17, 2017ViewRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION filed by United States Army Corps of Engineers [Service Date: 03/17/2017 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 5,185 words. [17-5043] (Maysonett, James)
BL-11Mar 17, 2017ViewRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION filed by Dakota Access LLC [Service Date: 03/17/2017 by Hand Delivery] Length Certification: 5109 words.. [17-5043] (Estrada, Miguel)
BL-12Mar 17, 2017ViewREPLY [Service Date: 03/17/2017 by US Mail, Email, CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 2,551 words. [17-5043] (Ducheneaux, Nicole)
BL-13Mar 18, 2017ViewPER CURIAM ORDER Before Judges: Kavanaugh, Millett* and Wilkins. [17-5043] (A statement by Judge Millett concurring in the denial of the motion is attached)
BL-14Mar 23, 2017RequestCLERK'S ORDER [1667413] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 05/02/2017. APPENDIX due 05/02/2017. APPELLEE Brief due on 06/01/2017. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 06/15/2017 [17-5043]
BL-15Mar 24, 2017ViewMOTION [1667971] for leave to intervene styled as "motion for the plaintiffs-appellants interalia for permission to participate in appellate arugments and present treaty civil rights" [Disclosure Listing: Not Attached] filed by Clayton S. Creek [Service Date: 03/27/2017 ] [17-5043]
BL-16Apr 28, 2017ViewUNOPPOSED MOTION [1673152] to dismiss case voluntarily filed by Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe [Service Date: 04/28/2017 ] Length Certification: 1,862. [17-5043] (Ducheneaux, Nicole)
BL-17May 15, 2017RequestCLERK'S ORDER , issuing mandate [17-5043]
BL-18May 15, 2017RequestMANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, U.S. District Court. [17-5043]
BL-19Jun 9, 2017ViewMOTION (Response to Motion served by mail due on 06/23/2017), to intervene (Response to Motion served by mail due on 06/23/2017) filed by Clayton S. Creek (Service Date: 06/13/2017 by CM/ECF NDA, Clerk) Length Certification: 3 Pages. [17-5043]
BL-20Jul 18, 2017RequestSUPPLEMENT filed by Clayton S. Creek [Service Date: 07/11/2017 ] [17-5043]
BL-21Aug 2, 2017RequestCLERK'S ORDER [17-5043]
BL-22Oct 27, 2017ViewMOTION [1702212] styled as "appellants interlocutory appeal motion filed by Clayton Creek Amicus" filed by Clayton S. Creek [Service Date: 10/31/2017 ] Length Certification: 3 pages. [17-5043]
BL-23Oct 27, 2017RequestMOTION [1702215] styled as "motion of Clayton Creek on behalf of appellants, for permission to reintervene in all matter of objections against pipeline constructions(s)". filed by Clayton S. Creek [Service Date: 10/31/2017 ] Length Certification: 3 pages. [17-5043]
BL-24Dec 29, 2017ViewPER CURIAM ORDER [1710909] filed upon the motion styled as appellants interlocutory appeal motion filed by Clayton Creek Amicus and the motion styled as motion of Clayton Creek on behalf of appellants, for permission to reintervene in all matter of objections against pipeline constructions(s), both of which are construed as seeking reconsideration of the courts order filed August 2, 2017, dismissing as moot movants motions to intervene and reconsider, it is ORDERED that the motions be denied. Because the case had closed, the court could not provide the relief requested in the motions to intervene and reconsider. Therefore, they were properly dismissed as moot in the August 2, 2017 order. The Clerk is directed not to accept any further filings from Clayton S. Creek in this closed case. Before Judges: Rogers, Tatel, and Millett. [17-5043]

Jump To
Please enter a valid page number
Pagination
Show Pagination
 

back to top

Enter a Client Matter

Your firm optionally allows a client matter to be selected while you are using Bloomberg Law. Please contact your administrator if you have any questions. Please select from a recently used Client Matter or enter a Client Matter manually.
RECENTLY USED
CLIENT MATTER
Please contact your administrator if you have questions about client matter.
Cancel Submit
Unrecognized Client Matter

Client Matter   does not currently exist in Bloomberg Law. Would you like to add this client matter to the system?
Bloomberg Industry Group
About Us Contact Us
Other Products
Big Law Business Professional Learning BNA
Help Topics
Getting Started BCite Citator Smart Code Points of Law Browse All Help Topics
24/7 BLAW® Help Desk
888.560.2529
help@bloomberglaw.com
0.1461.0
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright Accessibility
© 2022 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.