Request a Demo Log In
DeWitt Lambert v. Tesla, Inc., Docket No. 18-15203 (9th Cir. Feb 08, 2018), Court Docket
X1Q6NV06H982
DOCKETS
DeWitt Lambert v. Tesla, Inc.

Search

Search over:

No Matches Found

Search term(s) not found.

Docket Entries Since Last Update
NOTE: This court's RSS feed does not list MOTION entries, so Bloomberg Law cannot detect them and thus they will not be listed here. However, motions will be included if you update the docket.

Copy with Citation

Copy the text below to paste into your document.

Link citations to Bloomberg Law
Court Dockets
ca9
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Docket for Case #: 18-15203

DeWitt Lambert v. Tesla, Inc.

DOCKET INFORMATION
Minimize
Date Filed: Feb 8, 2018
Status: Closed
Nature of suit:3442 Jobs
Original Cases:
3:17-cv-05369-VC on 2017-09-15, U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Francisco
District: 0971
NOA Date: Feb 7, 2018

Parties and Attorneys

Expand AllMinimize
Expand All
Hide Section

 Plaintiff - Appellant,
DEWITT LAMBERT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Representation
Lawrence Anthony Organ, Trial Attorney
Law Offices of Lawrence A. Organ
407 San Anselmo avenue
94960
San Anselmo, CA 94960
Personal: 415-453-4740
[COR LD NTC Retained]
Noah Baron
California Civil Rights Law Group
332 San Anselmo Avenue
San Anselmo, CA 94960
Personal: 415-453-4740
[COR NTC Retained]

 Defendant - Appellee,
TESLA, INC., DBA Tesla Motors, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee,
Representation
Danielle L. Ochs
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Steuart Tower
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Personal: 415-442-4810
[COR LD NTC Retained]
Roshni Chaudhari Kapoor
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Steuart Tower
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Personal: 415-442-4810
[COR NTC Retained]

Docket Entries

Reverse Entries
Hide Section
Print Entries Request Entries Reverse Entries

EntryFiledPDFDescription
BL-1Feb 8, 2018RequestDOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/15/2018. Appellant DeWitt Lambert opening brief due 04/09/2018. Appellee Tesla, Inc. answering brief due 05/08/2018. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [10756201] (JMR)
BL-2Feb 14, 2018RequestFiled (ECF) Appellant DeWitt Lambert Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/14/2018. [10764779] [18-15203] (Organ, Lawrence)
BL-3Feb 21, 2018RequestMEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 03/07/2018, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [10772411] (CL)
BL-4Mar 15, 2018RequestMEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [10800321] (CL)
BL-5Mar 26, 2018Request<b>Form 13 Streamlined request by Appellant DeWitt Lambert to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is not available for use by counsel registered for electronic filing. </b> [10811528] (LW)
BL-6Mar 26, 2018RequestFiled (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant DeWitt Lambert. New requested due date is 05/09/2018. [10811907] [18-15203] (Organ, Lawrence)
BL-7Mar 26, 2018Request<b>Streamlined request [6] by Appellant DeWitt Lambert to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant DeWitt Lambert opening brief due 05/09/2018. Appellee Tesla, Inc. answering brief due 06/08/2018. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. </b> [10812020] (LW)
BL-8May 9, 2018ViewSubmitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant DeWitt Lambert. Date of service: 05/09/2018. [10867641] [18-15203] (Organ, Lawrence)
BL-9May 9, 2018RequestSubmitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant DeWitt Lambert. Date of service: 05/09/2018. [10867647] [18-15203]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts of record, volume 2. 05/10/2018 by SLM] (Organ, Lawrence)
BL-10May 10, 2018RequestFiled clerk order: The opening brief submitted by DeWitt Lambert. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [10868921] (KWG)
BL-11May 14, 2018RequestReceived 7 paper copies of Opening Brief filed by DeWitt Lambert. [10871982] (SD)
BL-12May 14, 2018RequestFiled 4 paper copies of excerpts of record in 2 volume(s) filed by Appellant DeWitt Lambert. [10874626] (LA)
BL-13May 25, 2018RequestFiled (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Tesla, Inc.. New requested due date is 07/09/2018. [10885805] [18-15203] (Ochs, Danielle)
BL-14May 25, 2018Request<b>Streamlined request [13] by Appellee Tesla, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee Tesla, Inc. answering brief due 07/09/2018. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. </b> [10885817] (DLM)
BL-15Jul 9, 2018ViewSubmitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Tesla, Inc.. Date of service: 07/09/2018. [10936014] [18-15203] (Ochs, Danielle)
BL-16Jul 10, 2018RequestFiled clerk order: The answering brief submitted by Tesla, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10937357] (LA)
BL-17Jul 12, 2018RequestReceived 7 paper copies of Answering Brief filed by DeWitt Lambert. [10941867] (SD)
BL-18Jul 30, 2018ViewSubmitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant DeWitt Lambert. Date of service: 07/30/2018. [10960258] [18-15203] (Organ, Lawrence)
BL-19Jul 31, 2018RequestFiled clerk order: The reply brief submitted by DeWitt Lambert is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10961293] (KWG)
BL-20Aug 2, 2018RequestReceived 7 paper copies of Reply Brief filed by DeWitt Lambert. [10963787] (SD)
BL-21Nov 29, 2018RequestThis case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco<br><br>Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for March 2019 and the two subsequent sitting months in that location at <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions" >http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions</a>. If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please inform the court <i>within 3 days of this notice</i>, using CM/ECF (<b>Type of Document</b>: File Correspondence to Court; <b>Subject</b>: regarding availability for oral argument).<br><br>When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date.<br><br>If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter <i>within 3 days of this notice</i>, using CM/ECF (<b>Type of Document</b>: File Correspondence to Court; <b>Subject</b>: request for mediation).[11103800] (AW)
BL-22Nov 30, 2018RequestFiled (ECF) Appellee Tesla, Inc. Correspondence: Availability for Oral Argument. Date of service: 11/30/2018 [11104882] [18-15203] (Ochs, Danielle)
BL-23Nov 30, 2018RequestFiled (ECF) notice of appearance of Noah Butsch Baron for Appellant DeWitt Lambert. Date of service: 11/30/2018. [11105113] [18-15203] (Baron, Noah)
BL-24Nov 30, 2018RequestAdded attorney Noah Baron for DeWitt Lambert, in case 18-15203. [11105134] (CW)
BL-25Nov 30, 2018RequestFiled (ECF) Appellant DeWitt Lambert Correspondence: Correspondence: Regarding Availability for Oral Argument. Date of service: 11/30/2018 [11105146] [18-15203] (Baron, Noah)
BL-26Dec 21, 2018RequestThis case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco<br><br>Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for April 2019 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions" >http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions</a>. If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf">Form 32</a> <b>within 3 business days of this notice</b> using the CM/ECF filing type <b>Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument</b>. Please follow the form's <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf">instructions</a> carefully.<br><br>When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date.<br><br>If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter <b>within 3 business days of this notice</b>, using CM/ECF (<b>Type of Document</b>: File Correspondence to Court; <b>Subject</b>: request for mediation).[11130028] (AW)
BL-27Dec 21, 2018RequestFiled (ECF) Attorney Mr. Noah Baron for Appellant DeWitt Lambert response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 12/21/2018. [11130213] [18-15203] (Baron, Noah)
BL-28Dec 21, 2018RequestFiled (ECF) Appellee Tesla, Inc. Correspondence: Response to Notice of Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Date of service: 12/21/2018 [11131352] [18-15203] (Ochs, Danielle)
BL-29Jan 3, 2019RequestFiled (ECF) notice of appearance of Roshni Chaudhari Kapoor for Appellee Tesla, Inc.. Date of service: 01/03/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11139957] [18-15203] (Kapoor, Roshni)
BL-30Jan 3, 2019RequestAdded attorney Roshni Chaudhari Kapoor for Tesla, Inc., in case 18-15203. [11139999] (CW)
BL-31Jan 3, 2019RequestFiled (ECF) Attorney Ms. Roshni Chaudhari Kapoor for Appellee Tesla, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 01/03/2019. [11140110] [18-15203] (Kapoor, Roshni)
BL-32Feb 3, 2019RequestNotice of Oral Argument on Wednesday, April 17, 2019 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - San Francisco CA.<br><br>View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar/view.php?caseno=18-15203"><b>here</b></a>.<br><br>Be sure to review the <a href="http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/forms/hearing_notice/ntc_hear.pdf">GUIDELINES</a> for important information about your hearing, including when to arrive (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible).<br><br>If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the <b><u><a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar/info.php?view=Forms">ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE</a></u></b> filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Wednesday, April 17, 2019. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[11176997] (AW)
BL-33Feb 25, 2019RequestFiled (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Danielle L. Ochs for Appellee Tesla, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco on 04/17/2019 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 10.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 02/25/2019. [11206107] [18-15203] (Ochs, Danielle)
BL-34Feb 25, 2019RequestFiled (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Lawrence Anthony Organ for Appellant DeWitt Lambert. Hearing in San Francisco on 04/17/2019 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 10.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 02/25/2019. [11207103] [18-15203] (Organ, Lawrence)
BL-35Apr 8, 2019RequestNotice of Oral Argument on Tuesday, April 16, 2019 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - San Francisco CA.<br><br>View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar/view.php?caseno=18-15203"><b>here</b></a>.<br><br>Be sure to review the <a href="http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/forms/hearing_notice/ntc_hear.pdf">GUIDELINES</a> for important information about your hearing, including when to arrive (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible).<br><br>If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the <b><u><a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar/info.php?view=Forms">ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE</a></u></b> filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Tuesday, April 16, 2019. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[11256170] (AW)
BL-36Apr 9, 2019RequestFiled (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Noah Baron for Appellant DeWitt Lambert. Hearing in San Francisco on 04/16/2019 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1, 3rd Floor, Rm 338). Filer sharing argument time: No. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 04/09/2019. [11258083] [18-15203] (Baron, Noah)
BL-37Apr 10, 2019RequestFiled (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Danielle L. Ochs for Appellee Tesla, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco on 04/16/2019 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1, 3rd Floor, Rm. 338). Filer sharing argument time: No. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 04/10/2019. [11259757] [18-15203] (Ochs, Danielle)
BL-38Apr 16, 2019RequestARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KATHRYN H. VRATIL. [11265482] (TG)
BL-39Apr 16, 2019RequestFiled Audio recording of oral argument.<br> <b>Note:</b> Video recordings of public argument calendars are available on the Court's website, at <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/">http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/</a><br>[11266129] (TG)
BL-40May 17, 2019ViewFILED OPINION (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KATHRYN H. VRATIL) AFFIRMED. Judge: SRT Concurring, Judge: MDS Authoring, FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11300899] (RMM)
BL-41May 31, 2019ViewFiled (ECF) Appellant DeWitt Lambert petition for rehearing en banc (from 05/17/2019 opinion). Date of service: 05/31/2019. [11316128] [18-15203] (Baron, Noah)
BL-42Jul 10, 2019RequestFiled order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KATHRYN H. VRATIL) Chief Judge Thomas and Judge M. Smith vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Vratil so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. [11359070] (WL)
BL-43Jul 18, 2019ViewMANDATE ISSUED.(SRT, MDS and KHV) [11367563] (CW)

Jump To
Please enter a valid page number
Pagination
Show Pagination
 

back to top

Enter a Client Matter

Your firm optionally allows a client matter to be selected while you are using Bloomberg Law. Please contact your administrator if you have any questions. Please select from a recently used Client Matter or enter a Client Matter manually.
RECENTLY USED
CLIENT MATTER
Please contact your administrator if you have questions about client matter.
Cancel Submit
Unrecognized Client Matter

Client Matter   does not currently exist in Bloomberg Law. Would you like to add this client matter to the system?
Bloomberg Industry Group
About Us Contact Us
Other Products
Big Law Business Professional Learning BNA
Help Topics
Getting Started BCite Citator Smart Code Points of Law Browse All Help Topics
24/7 BLAW® Help Desk
888.560.2529
help@bloomberglaw.com
0.1437.0
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright Accessibility
© 2022 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.